Interstate water compacts by Joseph Francis Zimmerman Download PDF EPUB FB2
Interstate Water Compacts: Intergovernmental Efforts to Manage America's Water Resources - Kindle edition by Zimmerman, Joseph F. Download it once and read it on Interstate water compacts book Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets.
Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Interstate Water Compacts: Intergovernmental Efforts to Manage America's Water by: 2.
Today, more than interstate Compacts directly regulate or guide policy for a range of matters as diverse as use and allocation of water, land, and natural resources. There are Compacts for environmental protection, transportation systems, regional economic development, professional licensing, education, crime control and corrections, and.
Interstate Water Compacts: Intergovernmental Efforts to Manage America's Water Resources [Joseph F. Zimmerman] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Examines intergovernmental efforts within the United States to manage the nation's water supply.
Long taken for granted. Chapter 1 - General Law of Interstate Compacts Bench Book - Interpretation of Interstate Compacts Because Compacts are statutes and contracts, courts interpret interstate Compacts in the same manner as interpreting ordinary statutes and by applying contract law principles.
The process for entering into interstate and federal-interstate compacts is explained in detail, as is the exercise of original jurisdiction by the US Supreme Court to resolve intractable interstate controversies involving interpretation of provisions of compacts, water apportionment, and water pollution abatement.
The result is the Model Interstate Water Compact, which encourages states to assume oversight of trans-boundary resources, especially water, avoiding the inefficiency and expense of legal action. In addition to the authors' proposed model, there is a complete cross-referenced listing of existing interstate water compacts in the appendix.
In Interstate Water Compacts author Joseph F. Zimmerman highlights the growing importance of water issues within the United States and a device that has been instrumental in facilitating interstate cooperation to solve water-related problems: the interstate by: 2.
Kansas is a party to four interstate river compacts that allocate water in major interstate rivers. Kansas also participates in the Missouri River Basin Association of States and Tribes. Below are links to compact documents, maps, updates and data related to these interstate basins. Get this from a library.
Interstate water compacts: the interstate compact and federal-interstate compact. [Muys, Jerome C.; United States. National Water Commission.]. Get this from a library. Interstate water compacts: a bibliography.
[Frank Edward Maloney; Water Resources Scientific Information Center.; United States. Office of Water Research and Technology.]. California-Nevada Interstate Compact-- Would establish a commission to administer water rights involving Lake Tahoe and the Carson, Truckee, and Walker States have ratified the compact and are abiding by it even though Congress has not ratified it.
Some of the issues involved were addressed in P.L.the Fallon Paiute Shoshone Indian Tribes Water Rights Settlement Act of Interstate Water Pollution Control Compacts. Louisiana-Mississippi Tangipahoa River Waterway Compact of (Louisiana & Mississippi) Mississippi River Interstate Pollution Phase-Out Compact (Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, Wisconsin, & USA).
Most early interstate compacts resolved boundary disputes, but since the early 20th century, compacts have increasingly been used as a tool of state cooperation.
In some cases, an agreement will create a new multi-state governmental agency which is responsible for administering or improving some shared resource such as a seaport or public. Interstate compacts allow states to reach their own agreement.
Congress must authorize the states to negotiate; Congress must approve the compact once an negotiated agreement is reached, a Congressionally approved agreement assumes the character of federal law. See U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service list of Interstate Water Apportionment Compacts.
List of compacts. The table below lists interstate compacts formed between and Compacts are written agreements among or between States which have been approved by the United States Congress. They are enacted in Federal statutes as well as the statutes of each of the agreeing States.
Among other things, interstate stream compacts apportion the waters in major streams and their tributaries between or among the agreeing States. Instead, the book is largely filled with lengthy descriptions of all the interstate compacts that have even remotely involved water and many that do not.
After the first chapter, Zimmerman describes interstate compacts generally, including the negotiation, adoption, and enforcement of the agreements. Texas is a signatory to five interstate river compacts. Texas is represented on each of these interstate river compacts by one of five interstate river compacts commissions.
The compacts are agreements (contracts) signed by the states involved and ratified by the legislature of each state and by Congress. Interstate Compacts As a headwaters state, Wyoming is party to seven interstate compacts and 2 U.S.
Supreme Court decrees. In addition to participating in the Commissions that have been established to administer these compacts, the State Engineer also participates in a number of basin- or region-wide water resource groups and associations. North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, USA +1 () [email protected] © Project MUSE.
Produced by Johns Hopkins University Author: Jerome C. Muys, George William Sherk, Marilyn C. O'Leary. As the name suggests, the article looks at the major interstate water compacts in light of expected climate change impacts on water resources. The article may also be a useful resource for water policy wonks, as it includes short summaries of every interstate water allocation compact (27 in all) and brief analyses.
NCIC HOME» ABOUT NCIC» NEWS» COMPACTS» DATABASE» RESOURCES» SUMMIT OF THE STATES» CONTACT» Dan Logsdon | Manager, National Center for Interstate Compacts.
office. [email protected] The Bear River Compact is a document voluntarily written by the states which establishes the rights and obligations of Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming with respect to the waters of the Bear River. The Compact became effective on Ma Interstate Compacts: Background and History About Interstate Compacts Interstate compacts are contracts between two or more states creating an agreement on a variety of issues, such as specific policy challenges, regulatory matters and boundary settlements.
States have used interstate compacts to address a variety of issues, including. Interstate compacts are an increasingly important and popular form of cooperation among states.
Through compacts, states can address shared problems, promote a common agenda, and produce collective goods on a wide array of issues such as child welfare, criminal justice, education, health, natural resources, taxation and transportation.
Coachella Valley Water District and the development of the doctrine of federal reserved rights to water. This post explores the intersection of two topics that have historically been neglected in interstate water allocation, and in particular in interstate compacts: groundwater and.
I’ve just published a new article – “Interstate Water Compacts and Climate Change Adaptation” in the Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal. As the name suggests, the article looks at the major interstate water compacts in light of expected climate change impacts on water resources.
The article may also be a useful resource for water policy wonks, as it includes short summaries of. Inhe added another entry, publishing Interstate Water Compacts: Intergovernmental Efforts to Manage America’s Water Resources. With Horizontal Federalism, Zimmerman has produced a solid, comprehensive volume on interstate : Ann O’M.
Bowman. Interstate Compacts South Platte River Compact (). Divides the waters of the South Platte River between Colorado and Nebraska, giving Colorado the right to fully use the water between Oct.
Inst.to () (describing the nature of interstate water litigation). Interstate water litigation began in the early twentieth century when Kansas sued Colorado. See infra notes 86–87 and accompanying text (discussing Kansas v. Colorado). 3 See Draper, supra note 2, at to (citing a number of cases involving.
When it comes to looking at how water resources are regulated, there are state water laws as well as federal ones, issues relating to water on private land versus public, and interstate water compacts.
Water law in the United States developed in different directions based in large part on geographical conditions as well as land ownership.Disputes among states sharing interstate waters have increased significantly over the past two decades. These disputes, which involve the states' respective quantitative shares of such waters, water quality concerns, and the effects of a variety of federal environmental laws enacted since the early s, have been of increasing concern to the members of the Committee on Energy and Natural.Interstate Water Compact Participation.
Arkansas is a member of two interstate water compacts. States enter into these contracts to solve problems that cross statelines. Compacts are recognized as federal law and only become effective once ratified by each member state and Congress.